Peace And Justice Law Center

Organization Overview

Peace And Justice Law Center is located in Fullerton, CA. According to its NTEE Classification (I83) the organization is classified as: Public Interest Law, under the broad grouping of Crime & Legal-Related and related organizations. As of 12/2022, Peace And Justice Law Center employed 2 individuals. This organization is an independent organization and not affiliated with a larger national or regional group of organizations. Peace And Justice Law Center is a 501(c)(3) and as such, is described as a "Charitable or Religous organization or a private foundation" by the IRS.

For the year ending 12/2022, Peace And Justice Law Center generated $92.5k in total revenue. This represents a relatively dramatic decline in revenue. Over the past 2 years, the organization has seen revenues fall by an average of (31.5%) each year. All expenses for the organization totaled $176.7k during the year ending 12/2022. You can explore the organizations financials more deeply in the financial statements section below.

Mission & Program ActivityExcerpts From the 990 Filing

TAX YEAR

2022

Describe the Organization's Mission:

Part 3 - Line 1

TO ADVANCE COMMUNITY SAFETY AND CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS.

Describe the Organization's Program Activity:

Part 3 - Line 4a

THE PJLC'S FIRST PROGRAM AREA, AS MEASURED BY EXPENSE, IS HUMAN AND CIVIL RIGHTS DEFENSE. IN 2022, THE PJLC CONTRIBUTED TO THE DEFENSE OF HUMAN AND CIVIL RIGHTS BY LITIGATING A GANG INJUNCTION CASE IN ORANGE COUNTY, AND BY LITIGATING TWO LAWSUITS DEMANDING PUBLIC RECORDS RELATING TO CIVIL RIGHTS AND POLICING. IN THE CASE OF PEOPLE V. TOWNSEND STREET, THE PJLC REPRESENTED TWO INDIVIDUALS WHOM THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY IS SEEKING TO SUBJECT TO AN UNLAWFUL "GANG INJUNCTION." IF SUCCESSFUL, THE LITIGATION WILL RESULT IN THE DISSOLUTION OF AN INJUNCTION THAT DIRECTLY AFFECTS SCORES OF DEFENDANTS. BECAUSE THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S GANG INJUNCTION PROGRAM IS UNLAWFUL, COUNTERPRODUCTIVE, AND RACIALLY DISCRIMINATORY, THIS LITIGATION WILL BENEFIT THE PUBLIC GENERALLY BY CONTRIBUTING TO THE DEFENSE OF HUMAN AND CIVIL RIGHTS SECURED BY LAW, THE ELIMINATION OF PREJUDICE AND DISCRIMINATION, AND COMBATTING COMMUNITY DETERIORATION AND JUVENILE DELINQUENCY. OF THE PJLC'S TWO CLIENTS IN THIS MATTER, ONE IS INDIGENT AND THE OTHER IS NOT. HOWEVER, THE MATTER DEALS WITH AN INJUNCTION AND SO THE PJLC'S CLIENT HAS NOT FINANCIAL INTEREST IN THE OUTCOME. THE PJLC HAS NOT YET SOUGHT ANY FEES IN THE MATTER FROM THE PJLC'S CLIENT'S OPPOSING PARTY. THE SECOND CASE, ACLU V. INGLEWOOD POLICE DEPARTMENT, IS A CASE IN WHICH THE PJLC REPRESENTS ANOTHER ORGANIZATION, THE AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION, AND AN INDIVIDUAL IN A CASE SEEKING A JUDICIAL ORDER THAT THE INGLEWOOD POLICE DEPARTMENT MUST MAKE PUBLIC CERTAIN DOCUMENTS IT CONSIDERS CONFIDENTIAL. BECAUSE THIS LITIGATION INVOLVES INVESTIGATIONS INTO NUMEROUS CIVIL RIGHTS VIOLATIONS BY THE INGLEWOOD POLICE DEPARTMENT AND WILL HELP SETTLE QUESTIONS OF STATUTORY INTERPRETATION COMMON TO DISPUTES OVER WHETHER POLICE DOCUMENTS ARE CONFIDENTIAL, THIS CASE WILL BENEFIT THE PUBLIC BY CONTRIBUTING TO THE DEFENSE OF HUMAN AND CIVIL RIGHTS SECURED BY LAW, AND THE ELIMINATION OF PREJUDICE AND DISCRIMINATION. THE PJLC'S CLIENTS IN THIS MATTER ARE NOT INDIGENT, BUT THE MATTER DEALS WITH INJUNCTIVE RELIEF AND SO THE PJLC'S CLIENTS HAVE NO FINANCIAL INTEREST IN THE OUTCOME. THE RELIEF SOUGHT INCLUDES AN AWARD OF ATTORNEYS' FEES FROM THE OPPOSING PARTY. FINALLY, THE THIRD CASE, CHICANXS UNIDXS V. SPITZER, IS A CASE IN WHICH THE PJLC REPRESENTS THREE ORGANIZATIONS, CHICANXS UNIDXS AND TWO CHAPTERS OF THE AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION, ALL OF WHOM SEEK A JUDICIAL ORDER THAT THE ORANGE COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY MUST MAKE PUBLIC CERTAIN DOCUMENTS IT CONSIDERS CONFIDENTIAL. BECAUSE THIS LITIGATION INVOLVES INVESTIGATIONS INTO RACIAL DISPARITIES IN PROSECUTIONS NECESSARY TO IMPLEMENT CALIFORNIA'S RACIAL JUSTICE ACT, THIS CASE WILL BENEFIT THE PUBLIC BY CONTRIBUTING TO THE DEFENSE OF HUMAN AND CIVIL RIGHTS SECURED BY LAW, AND THE ELIMINATION OF PREJUDICE AND DISCRIMINATION. THE PJLC'S CLIENTS IN THIS MATTER ARE NOT INDIGENT, BUT THE MATTER DEALS WITH INJUNCTIVE RELIEF AND SO THE PJLC'S CLIENTS HAVE NO FINANCIAL INTEREST IN THE OUTCOME. THE RELIEF SOUGHT INCLUDES AN AWARD OF ATTORNEYS' FEES FROM THE OPPOSING PARTY.


THE PJLC'S SECOND PROGRAM AREA, AS MEASURED BY EXPENSE, IS EDUCATION. IN 2022, THE PJLC CONTINUED TO CONVENE THE DECRIMINALIZING NEIGHBORHOODS NETWORK, A NETWORK OF ORGANIZATIONS AND INDIVIDUALS COMMITTED TO EDUCATING THE PUBLIC ABOUT GANG PARTICIPATION AND LAW ENFORCEMENT'S GANG SUPPRESSION ACTIVITIES AS A BROAD TOPIC. AS PART OF THIS WORK, THE PJLC ENGAGED IN NONPARTISAN RESEARCH INTO THE EFFECTS OF CALIFORNIA'S ASSEMBLY BILL 333, WHICH REVISED THE DEFINITION OF A CRIMINAL STREET GANG IN THE STATE'S PENAL CODE. WITH THE SUPPORT OF LAW STUDENT VOLUNTEERS, THE PJLC REQUESTED DATA FROM EVERY COUNTY IN THE STATE AND FROM THE CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION THAT WOULD ALLOW THE PJLC TO TRACK WHETHER THERE WAS ANY CHANGE IN THE FREQUENCY OF GANG PROSECUTIONS, GANG PROSECUTION PLEA DEALS, OR JURY FINDINGS OF INNOCENCE OR GUILT. THE PJLC ALSO ENGAGED IN AD HOC NONPARTISAN PRESENTATIONS TO COMMUNITY ON BROAD ISSUES OF CIVIL RIGHTS AND CRIMINAL JUSTICE LAW, PARTICULARLY AS RELATE TO CALIFORNIA'S RACIAL JUSTICE ACT.


THE PJLC'S THIRD PROGRAM AREA, AS MEASURED BY EXPENSE, IS LEGAL AID. THE PJLC PROVIDED LEGAL AID TO SIX INDIVIDUALS IN 2022. THIS AID INVOLVED THE OFFER OF COUNSEL AS WELL AS COURT AND ADMINISTRATIVE REPRESENTATION REGARDING ISSUES INCLUDING GANG INJUNCTIONS AND POLICE MISCONDUCT. IN 2022, THE PJLC ALSO SECURED AN AGREEMENT WITH THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA TO HELP FUND AN EXPANSION OF THE PJLC'S LEGAL AID PROGRAM IN 2023.


Get More from Intellispect for FreeCreate a free account to get more data, nonprofit salaries, advanced search and more.

Financial Statements

Statement of Revenue
Federated campaigns$0
Membership dues$0
Fundraising events$0
Related organizations$0
Government grants $0
All other contributions, gifts, grants, and similar amounts not included above$92,000
Noncash contributions included in lines 1a–1f $0
Total Revenue from Contributions, Gifts, Grants & Similar$92,000
Total Program Service Revenue$0
Investment income $474
Tax Exempt Bond Proceeds $0
Royalties $0
Net Rental Income $0
Net Gain/Loss on Asset Sales $0
Net Income from Fundraising Events $0
Net Income from Gaming Activities $0
Net Income from Sales of Inventory $0
Miscellaneous Revenue$0
Total Revenue $92,474

Peer Organizations

Organization NameAssets
Oregon Law Center
Portland, OR
$14,380,967
Asian Law Caucus
San Francisco, CA
$13,754,993
Community Legal Services
Phoenix, AZ
$9,557,116
Greater Bakersfield Legal Assistance Inc
Bakersfield, CA
$6,394,724
Public Advocates Inc
San Francisco, CA
$7,552,051
Southern Arizona Legal Aid Inc
Tucson, AZ
$5,014,859
Oregon Consumer Justice
Portland, OR
$7,116,411
Center On Race Poverty & Environment
Delano, CA
$2,083,620
Center For Justice & Accountability
San Francisco, CA
$2,242,200
Willamette Valley Law Project
Woodburn, OR
$1,193,057
Initiate Justice
Los Angeles, CA
$1,440,499
Asociacion Interamericana Para La Defensa Del Ambiente
San Francisco, CA
$2,283,820
Environmental Defense Center
Santa Barbara, CA
$2,097,346
Public Interest Law Project
Oakland, CA
$2,273,965
Legal Access Alameda
San Francisco, CA
$1,697,783
Public Service Law Corporation Of The Riverside County Bar Associati
Riverside, CA
$1,762,100
Social Justice Legal Foundation
Los Angeles, CA
$1,474,006
Advocates For Faith & Freedom Inc
Murrieta, CA
$823,255
East Yard Communities For Environmental Justice
Los Angeles, CA
$2,703,962
Oregon Crime Victims Law Center
Portland, OR
$1,256,855
Brown Family Foundation For Education And The Arts
Sacramento, CA
$1,063
American Freedom Law Center Inc
Phoenix, AZ
$430,803
Volunteer Legal Services Hawaii
Honolulu, HI
$699,222
Free Law Project
Oakland, CA
$639,041
Western Mobilehome Association Issues Committee
Sacramento, CA
$0

Create an account to unlock the data you need.

or