Masonry Alliance For Codes And Standards is located in Herndon, VA. The organization was established in 2006. According to its NTEE Classification (S41) the organization is classified as: Chambers of Commerce & Business Leagues, under the broad grouping of Community Improvement & Capacity Building and related organizations. This organization is an independent organization and not affiliated with a larger national or regional group of organizations. Masonry Alliance For Codes And Standards is a 501(c)(6) and as such, is described as a "Business League, Chambers of Commerce, or Real Estate Board" by the IRS.
For the year ending 12/2021, Masonry Alliance For Codes And Standards generated $164.1k in total revenue. This represents relatively stable growth, over the past 6 years the organization has increased revenue by an average of 7.1% each year. All expenses for the organization totaled $171.2k during the year ending 12/2021. While expenses have increased by 4.7% per year over the past 6 years. They've been increasing with an increasing level of total revenue. You can explore the organizations financials more deeply in the financial statements section below.
Form
990EZ
Mission & Program ActivityExcerpts From the 990EZ Filing
TAX YEAR
2021
Describe the Organization's Program Activity:
Part 3
ENERGY CONSERVATION: THE MACS ENERGY CONSULTANT, WORKING WITH THE PCA REPRESENTATIVE ON ASHRAE 90.L, HAD THEIR APPEALS ON ADDENDUM Z UPHELD. ADDENDUM Z CONTAINS PROVISIONS REQUIRING AIR BARRIERS FOR BUILDING ENVELOPES. THEY WERE FOUND BY SOME TO BE ARBITRARY, TECHNICALLY UNFOUNDED, AND NOT ECONOMICALLY JUSTIFIED. THE APPEAL PREVENTED THESE REQUIREMENTS FROM ADVANCING TO PUBLICATION AND BEING PLACED IN THE STANDARD. IF THE PROVISIONS HAD ADVANCED AS WRITTEN, SINGLE-WYTHE MASONRY IN ANY JURISDICTION THAT ADOPTED THE NEW ASHRAE 90.1 ENERGY STANDARD FOR NEW BUILDINGS EXCEPT LOW-RISE RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS WOULD BE REQUIRED TO APPLY COATINGS AND SINGLE-WYTHE CONSTRUCTION WOULD BE PRICED OUT OF THE MARKETPLACE. WHILE EFFORTS TO REQUIRE AIR BARRIERS WILL NOT DISAPPEAR, THEY WILL CONTINUE TO BE ADDRESSED IN THE ASHRAE STANDARDS AND I-CODES. THE SUCCESSFUL APPEAL HAS GIVEN THE MASONRY INDUSTRY ADDITIONAL TIME TO DEVELOP APPROPRIATE TEST METHODS AND DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION PROCEDURES TO EFFECTIVELY AND AFFORDABLY REDUCE AIRFLOW THROUGH SINGLE-WYTHE MASONRY. IN ADDITION, THE APPEAL SHOULD LEAD TO REFINEMENT OF THE PROVISIONS TO ENSURE, TO THE BEST DEGREE POSSIBLE, CORRECT TECHNICAL SUBSTANTIATION AND ECONOMIC JUSTIFICATION. OTHER HIGH PRIORITY ENERGY ISSUES INCLUDE CONTINUED EFFORTS TO RETAIN AND IMPROVE THERMAL MASS BENEFITS, AND TO ENSURE THAT THERMAL RESISTANCE REQUIREMENTS FOR OPAQUE WALLS ARE COST EFFECTIVE. FIRE PROTECTION: MACS SUPPORTED EFFORTS IN THE INTERNATIONAL BUILDING CODE (IBC) THAT RESULTED IN THE MINIMUM NUMBER OF EXIT STAIRWAYS IN HIGH-RISE BUILDINGS (THOSE MORE THAN 420 FT) BEING INCREASED FROM A MINIMUM OF TWO TO THREE. ADDING AN ADDITIONAL STAIRWAY INCREASES THE TOTAL INTERIOR EGRESS WIDTH OF EXIT STAIRWAY SHAFTS THAT MAY BE USED FOR EVACUATION DOWNWARD WHILE EMERGENCY RESPONDERS ON THE SAME STAIRWAYS ARE TRAVERSING UPWARD. THIS CHANGE SIGNIFICANTLY IMPROVES LIFE SAFETY AND THE ABILITY TO CONTROL AND EXTINGUISH FIRES. STAIRWAY ENCLOSURES ARE REQUIRED TO BE FIRE-RATED CONSTRUCTION. WHILE SUCH ENCLOSURES MAY NOT ALL BE CONSTRUCTED OF MASONRY, THE PRODUCT IS AN OPTION TO SATISFY THIS REQUIREMENT. HOWEVER, LIKE ANY CODE PROVISION, ONCE CHANGES ARE INCLUDED, THEY DO NOT NECESSARILY STAY THERE. THE EXTRA STAIRWAY PROVISION IS BEING CHALLENGED. STAIRWAYS USE SPACE AND REDUCE THE RENTAL OR USEABLE SPACE PER FLOOR. CHALLENGES ARE BEING MADE IN THIS CODE CYCLE TO ELIMINATE THE ADDITIONAL STAIRWAY. OTHER HIGH PRIORITY FIRE SAFETY CODE ISSUES FOR MASONRY INCLUDE RETAINING APPROPRIATE BUILDING HEIGHT AND AREA REQUIREMENTS, AND MINIMIZING TRADE-OFFS OF PASSIVE FIRE PROTECTION FOR FIRE SPRINKLERS. STRUCTURAL DESIGN: ONE OF THE BIGGEST ISSUES THAT AFFECTS THE STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF MASONRY BEING ADDRESSED BY MACS IS SPLICE LENGTHS IN WALLS, WHICH ARE A PROBLEM WHEN THE MINIMUM AMOUNT CALCULATED IS LARGER THAN THE HEIGHT OF THE WALL. TEMPORARY RELIEF WAS PROVIDED VIA CODE CHANGES SUBMITTED BY MACS TO MODIFY THE IBC WHILE THE ISSUE WAS BEING ADDRESSED IN THE STRUCTURAL DESIGN STANDARD (MSJC). OTHER KEY STRUCTURAL ISSUES ADDRESS ANCHORAGE, MAXIMUM PERCENTAGES OF STEEL REINFORCEMENT, AND GROUTING. WIND ISSUES: SOMETIMES THE POTENTIAL BENEFITS OF MACS CODE EFFORTS ARE SOMEWHAT OBSCURE. FOR EXAMPLE, MACS IS SUPPORTING A CODE CHANGE THAT PROHIBITS THE USE OF GRAVEL BALLAST FOR ROOFS EXPOSED TO HIGH WINDS, THUS REQUIRING OTHER ALTERNATIVES FOR THESE SYSTEMS. WHILE ONE ALTERNATIVE MAY BE AN ADHERED SINGLE-PLY ROOF IN LIEU OF A BALLASTED SINGLE-PLY ROOF, ANOTHER OPTION WOULD BE THE USE OF INTERCONNECTED MASONRY ROOF PAVERS. ALSO RELATED TO HURRICANES AND OTHER HIGH WIND EVENTS, MACS PROVIDED A FORUM FOR THE COORDINATION OF INDUSTRY EFFORTS TO ENHANCE THE DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION PROVISIONS THAT NOW APPEAR IN THE INTERNATIONAL CODE COUNCIL'S STANDARD FOR RESIDENTIAL CONSTRUCTION IN HIGH WIND REGIONS (ICC-600). THIS STANDARD IS THE RESULT OF AN EFFORT TO UPDATE THE STANDARD FOR HURRICANE RESISTANT RESIDENTIAL CONSTRUCTION (SSTD 10), FIRST PUBLISHED IN 1999 BY THE SOUTHERN BUILDING CODE CONGRESS INTERNATIONAL IN RESPONSE TO THE DEVASTATION RESULTING FROM HURRICANE ANDREW.
Name (title) | Role | Hours | Compensation |
---|---|---|---|
Jason Thompson Chairman | 1 | $0 | |
Kurtis Siggard Treasurer | 1 | $0 | |
Charles Clark Member At Large | 0 | $0 | |
Jan Boyer Secretary | 0 | $0 | |
Jamie Farny Vice-Chair | 0 | $0 | |
Phil Ledent Member At Large | 0 | $0 |
Statement of Revenue | |
---|---|
Total Revenue from Contributions, Gifts, Grants & Similar | $0 |
Total Program Service Revenue | $0 |
Membership dues | $164,055 |
Investment income | $15 |
Gain or Loss | $0 |
Net Income from Gaming & Fundraising | $0 |
Other Revenue | $0 |
Total Revenue | $164,070 |
Statement of Expenses | |
---|---|
Grants and similar amounts paid | $0 |
Benefits paid to or for members | $0 |
Salaries, other compensation, and employee benefits | $0 |
Professional fees and other payments to independent contractors | $170,204 |
Occupancy, rent, utilities, and maintenance | $0 |
Printing, publications, postage, and shipping | $0 |
Other expenses | $1,037 |
Total expenses | $171,241 |
Balance Sheet | |
---|---|
Cash, savings, and investments | $86,745 |
Other assets | $0 |
Total assets | $86,745 |
Total liabilities | $0 |
Net assets or fund balances | $86,745 |
Organization Name | Assets | Revenue |
---|---|---|
National Restaurant Association Washington, DC | $192,667,812 | $96,146,955 |
American Association Of State Highway & Transportation Officials Washington, DC | $177,160,624 | $97,013,353 |
National Federation Of Independent Business Inc Nashville, TN | $77,203,691 | $109,079,617 |
American Beverage Association Washington, DC | $114,967,236 | $101,585,081 |
Credit Union National Association Inc Washington, DC | $67,388,582 | $69,543,852 |
Edison Electric Institute Washington, DC | $198,917,565 | $81,084,181 |
Investment Company Institute Washington, DC | $76,230,571 | $72,478,404 |
Packaging Machinery Manufacturers Institute Inc Herndon, VA | $71,869,344 | $62,733,082 |
Consumer Technology Association Arlington, VA | $357,760,838 | $25,474,279 |
National Retail Federation Inc Washington, DC | $44,909,805 | $48,694,616 |
American Psychiatric Association Washington, DC | $179,554,491 | $53,525,834 |
Srcco Inc Durham, NC | $42,497,453 | $49,465,239 |